Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Autoclearing all accessors in a Mouse/Moose class

by yulivee07 (Sexton)
on Jan 29, 2016 at 12:55 UTC ( #1153991=perlquestion: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

yulivee07 has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Dear Perlmonks, I have to ask for your wisdom. I am currently writing a OO-Module in Mouse and came into trouble using predicates.

The Situation is as follows:
My Module is an extension to an already existing (huge legacy) deamon, written in procedural perl. This deamon instantiates an object of my Class and hands over a parameter hash in the constructor, to fill the objects accessors. Like this:

\%data = { customer_number => $custno, country => $country, ticket_typ +e => $ticketsystem }; $test_class = "Utils::Testclass::MyTest"->new($data); <\code> <p>Utils::Testclass::MyTest has correspondig accessors like this:</p> <code> has 'customer_number' => ( is => 'rw', reader => 'get_customer_number', writer => 'set_customer_number', predicate => 'has_customer_number', clearer => 'clear_customer_number', ); has 'country' => ( is => 'rw', reader => 'get_country', writer => 'set_country', predicate => 'has_country', clearer => 'clear_country', ); has 'ticket_type' => ( is => 'rw', reader => 'get_ticket_type', writer => 'set_ticket_type', predicate => 'has_ticket_type', clearer => 'clear_ticket_type', );

I wish to test if my accessors are set using my perdicate e.g. $self->has_country and based on which accessors are set the module does some internal magic. So far, nothing special, but my code did not work. Then I found this gem in the deamons code, which replaces all values which are undef with empty strings and kills my usage of predicates:

map { $data{$_} = '' unless defined $data{$_} } keys %data;

Note: It is not possible for me to change the code of the deamon. That program expects the empty string several times and I do not have permission to change that.

What can I do to get my predicates working under these conditions?

I already had the following ideas:

  1. performing if( not definded($self->get_country) || $self->get_country eq ''). Works, but is far from elegant and not the Mouse/Moose-OO-way. I'd prefer to use the predicate.
  2. I thought of the following trigger, to check my values before writing them to the accessor and eventually calling the clearer:
    has 'country' => ( is => 'rw', reader => 'get_country', writer => 'set_country', predicate => 'has_country', clearer => 'clear_country', trigger => sub { my ($self) = @_; if ( $self->get_country eq '' || not defined($sel +f->get_country) ) { $self->clear_country; } } );
    This is much more the direction that I want and I can use the predicate. However: I have to copy the exact same trigger method for every accessor, changing only the name of the get and clear methods. I really don't like this duplicate code, as there are going to be more accessors like these in the future.

Dear Perlmonks, do you have a more elegant idea on this topic? Anything with less duplicate code not throwing overboard the Mouse-OO-way?

I appreciate your thoughts,

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Autoclearing all accessors in a Mouse/Moose class
by choroba (Cardinal) on Jan 29, 2016 at 13:13 UTC
    has is a subroutine as any other. You can call it in a loop, you can pass variables as its arguments.
    for my $attr (qw( country customer_number ticket_type )) { my $reader = "get_$attr"; my $clearer = "clear_$attr"; has $attr => ( is => 'rw', reader => $reader, writer => "set_$attr", predicate => "has_$attr", clearer => $clearer, trigger => sub { my ($self) = @_; if (! defined $self->$reader || $self->$reader eq '' ) + { $self->$clearer; } } ); }

    Notice I switched the two conditions in the || to prevent warnings about undefined.

    ($q=q:Sq=~/;[c](.)(.)/;chr(-||-|5+lengthSq)`"S|oS2"`map{chr |+ord }map{substrSq`S_+|`|}3E|-|`7**2-3:)=~y+S|`+$1,++print+eval$q,q,a,

      Wow. Thats really clever. Mind is blown.
      I didn't even known I could stick has into subroutines like that. You didn't just solve my predicate problem, you also cleaned up my very similar accessors.
      Thanks a lot for your input!


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: perlquestion [id://1153991]
Approved by Corion
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (5)
As of 2023-12-11 03:12 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    What's your preferred 'use VERSION' for new CPAN modules in 2023?

    Results (41 votes). Check out past polls.