Re^4: Why the down votes?

I can't argue against such unassailable logic: I stand corrected and will henceforth follow your excellent suggestion in such circumstances. (smiley).

Comment on Re^4: Why the down votes?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Why the down votes? by jdporter (Canon) on Feb 12, 2016 at 16:47 UTC
Also - personally, I think one could easily hear a slight hint of sarcasm in the "eventually" part. PS - Your question is very similar to a pm faq (in case you hadn't seen that yet). I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies. Update: Fixed fax linx. Thanx, erix!	[reply]
Re^6: Why the down votes? by erix (Prior) on Feb 12, 2016 at 16:58 UTC
Nah, that's not sarcasm. This is sarcasm: Welcome to the monastery, jdporter ! You slightly messed up that link, didn't you? Please consult: Markup in the Monastery	[reply]


Don't ask to ask, just ask
	PerlMonks