:nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by Ratazong (Monsignor) on Apr 01, 2016 at 03:29 UTC
.niaga elbadaer txet eht ekam ot Acme::emcA esu ylpmis nac uoy neht esuaceb - yaw tsrif eht referp I gnozataR, FIGT	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by Discipulus (Canon) on Apr 01, 2016 at 03:39 UTC
Never, unless you are Leonardo da Vinci (see him reading the first State of the Onion issue) L* There are no rules, there are no thumbs.. Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by choroba (Cardinal) on Apr 01, 2016 at 17:41 UTC
I guess that nodehportsuob was omitted .enilitlum s'ti esuaceb ($q=q:Sq=~/;[c](.)(.)/;chr(-\|\|-\|5+lengthSq)`"S\|oS2"`map{chr \|+ord }map{substrSq`S_+\|`\|}3E\|-\|`7**2-3:)=~y+S\|`+$1,++print+eval$q,q,a, [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by Discipulus (Canon) on Apr 09, 2016 at 16:53 UTC
!adorohc ++ L* There are no rules, there are no thumbs.. Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by ExReg (Priest) on Apr 01, 2016 at 18:39 UTC
Awesome topic! I'm going to go write some reversible regexes for rongrongo.	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by BillKSmith (Monsignor) on Apr 01, 2016 at 07:43 UTC
I'll pass this month because you omitted "mirror image" from the list of choices. Bill	[reply]
Re^2: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by chacham (Prior) on Apr 01, 2016 at 12:21 UTC
you omitted "mirror image" from the list I'll ʜɒvɘ ƚo ɿɘʇlɘɔƚ on ƚʜɒƚ.	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by vitoco (Friar) on Apr 01, 2016 at 10:09 UTC
Hey! "have" was misspelled in "Who ndees baacdkrws wehn you have Tceilmopgyya?" option...	[reply]
Re^2: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by chacham (Prior) on Apr 01, 2016 at 12:19 UTC
The mddile leertts of all the wdors were silmpy put in aaabcehilptl oderr, maeinng some wdors did not caeghn.	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by talexb (Chancellor) on Apr 11, 2016 at 11:09 UTC
One of the occasions where a touch of dyslexia helps me out. Sweet. Alex / talexb / Toronto Thanks PJ. We owe you so much. Groklaw -- RIP -- 2003 to 2013.	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by dsheroh (Monsignor) on Apr 01, 2016 at 04:02 UTC
How do the options not include "Never." (or ".reveN")?	[reply]
Re^2: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by Pope-O-Matik (Pilgrim) on Apr 01, 2016 at 06:44 UTC
How do the options not include "Never." (or ".reveN")? What, no never? That's is like so backwards.	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by smknjoe (Beadle) on Apr 01, 2016 at 16:27 UTC
Whiskey.Tango.Foxtrot.	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by swampyankee (Parson) on Apr 11, 2016 at 14:48 UTC
lirpA fo yad tsrif eht no elbatpecca ylno s'tI Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting. — emc	[reply]
Re^2: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by Pope-O-Matik (Pilgrim) on Apr 17, 2016 at 14:02 UTC
lirpA fo yad tsrif eht no elbatpecca ylno s'tI You're all mixed up. I think you have that backwards.	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by jaredor (Priest) on Apr 24, 2016 at 22:14 UTC
.drawa caT fo esU sselesU a niw ot gniyrt era uoY	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by Pope-O-Matik (Pilgrim) on Apr 03, 2016 at 06:26 UTC
Do non-native English speakers have a hard time with this poll?	[reply]
Re^2: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by Discipulus (Canon) on Apr 09, 2016 at 17:05 UTC
Do non-native English speakers have a hard time with this poll? ?ruopiouQ L* There are no rules, there are no thumbs.. Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by chacham (Prior) on Apr 12, 2016 at 12:12 UTC
Typoglycemia does not seem to work in all languages. On top of that, there is added difficulty for non-native languages, due to the extra work.	[reply]
Re: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by ExReg (Priest) on Apr 01, 2016 at 12:25 UTC
�<22>�.<4>�F��.<4>�<22>�v<4>.<22>�<4>.<22>�<4>F�.�<4>�N�<4>F��N&��	[reply]
Re^2: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by ExReg (Priest) on Apr 01, 2016 at 13:13 UTC
Sorry, the <4>s can be replaced by <EOT>s and the <22>s by <SYN>s.	[reply]
Re^3: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by ExReg (Priest) on Apr 01, 2016 at 15:19 UTC
<Reveal this spoiler or all in this thread>	[reply]
eR: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by davies (Prior) on Apr 01, 2016 at 17:24 UTC
yyrj fn 31gbe rfh hbl aurJ fqentrE aubW	[reply]
Re: eR: :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW by Pope-O-Matik (Pilgrim) on Apr 01, 2016 at 18:05 UTC
.rghP .ghb rehtvs bg garzbz n xbbg gnuG	[reply]


Do you know where your variables are?
	PerlMonks