Why don't you try cpan Module::Name::Here?
CountZero A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James My blog: Imperial Deltronics
| [reply]
[d/l] |
Hello LloydRice,
I guess it’s a matter of taste, but in most cases I find it’s easier to use cpanm:
>cpanm Win32::Console
If things go wrong (e.g., a test fails), you can get the build details in the file build.log, which you’ll find in the newest directory under (say) ...\strawberry-perl-5.22.1.1-64bit-PDL\data\.cpanm\work\.
Note that cpanm is part of the App::cpanminus distribution, which is packaged as part of the Strawberry releases.
Hope that helps,
| [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |
I am not aware that any CPAN module is named console. If you want to use something like Win32::Console, then use the fully qualified name.
| [reply]
[d/l] |
G'day LloydRice,
I see you have an answer to your immediate problem.
For future reference, see the cpan documentation
(it's one of the built-in Utilities).
| [reply] |
