Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

by mr_mischief (Monsignor)
on Mar 30, 2017 at 17:35 UTC ( #1186521=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

I propose a middle ground. Let's have "planets" include "dwarf planets". We can have "major planets" and "dwarf planets" and call them all "planets" when there's no reason to distinguish between the two.

  • Comment on Re: Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?
by chacham (Prior) on Mar 31, 2017 at 13:11 UTC

    We can have "major planets" and "dwarf planets" and call them all "planets" when there's no reason to distinguish between the two.

    Wow! That's actually a great idea.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1186521]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-06-23 07:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?



    Results (125 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?