Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Joe
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Voting and Displaying Node Reputation

by footpad (Abbot)
on Oct 15, 2001 at 15:21 UTC ( [id://118897]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.


in reply to Voting and Displaying Node Reputation

You're right; this is something that has been discussed many times before.

You are aware that there are ways to find these nodes already, aren't you? You can:

  • Start by looking at Best Nodes, which lists the top nodes in the Monastery.

  • Go to a given monk's home node and sort their write-ups by Highest Reputation first.

  • Browse home nodes for nodes recommended by monks who's opinions you respect.

  • Check out the Most Visited Nodes. Or, simply bounce around.</P

  • And so on. Poke about in the corners, fiddle with the Snippets, etc.

Sure, it requires a little bit of work on your part, but isn't that what learning to master Perl--or programming in general--generally requires? Sure, someone could hand you the best nodes on a platter, but it's up to you to determine how to use that information to your advantage. All the best technique in the world won't help you improve unless you learn how to incorporate those ideas into your own work.

Also, keep in mind that highly reputed nodes aren't necessarily the most useful ones. Yes, we have some highly rated nodes containing wonderfully technical wisdom, however, we also have OT nodes with high reputations (including some of mine).

Reputation is a darkly-reflected idea of how the community at large liked a node at the time. It's not a measure of its accuracy, utility, or usefulness in any real-world situation. In fact, some of the most useful nodes have reasonably low reputations. I believe it's better to make your own decisions regarding a node's excellence. Vote that opinion, certainly, but take Reputation with a grain of salt. Finally, remember that some nodes have low reputations not because they were inaccurate, but because they were unpopular or controversial. Again, only you can judge a node's true worth.

As someone has pointed out repeatedly, 1_000_000 XP and $1.79 will buy you a cup of coffee.

It may be more fruitful to pick an area you wish you knew more about and then look for threads covering that area. I think you'll find as many gems buried at the bottom of threads as you will perusing any given monk's most well received works.

--f

  • Comment on Re: Voting and Displaying Node Reputation

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Voting and Displaying Node Reputation
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Oct 16, 2001 at 11:26 UTC
    Another place to look is on people homenodes. Many of the monks include lists of worthy posts, some of which are really good. I tend to routinely look at monks homenodes and have found them to be a mine of excellent information, if perhaps a little hard to search and unorganized.

    Update
    I heartily recommend Turnsteps home node. Kick ass!

    Yves
    --
    You are not ready to use symrefs unless you already know why they are bad. -- tadmc (CLPM)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://118897]
help
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Notices?
    hippoepoptai's answer Re: how do I set a cookie and redirect was blessed by hippo!
    erzuuliAnonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.