Re^2: Think Perl 6 (new book)

in reply to Re: Think Perl 6 (new book)
in thread Think Perl 6 (new book)

That's akin to saying that perl4 is not Perl.

To that end, perl1, perl2 or perl3 either.

I personally appreciate what you have to say, and you as a person, but your digging at perl6 is a bit ~disturbing~.

Why?

Is it a fear of Perlmonks being taken over? A fear of a job loss situation? I'm seriously curious, legitimately.

Comment on Re^2: Think Perl 6 (new book)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Think Perl 6 (new book) by 1nickt (Canon) on May 18, 2017 at 21:59 UTC
Not akin at all. Your Perl 4 program is Perl and will run under Perl 5. "Perl6" is a different language, as its own promotional blurb states .... so why does it continue to use the same name? The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply]
Re^4: Think Perl 6 (new book) by stevieb (Canon) on May 18, 2017 at 22:00 UTC
Because Larry Wall, the inventor and still current authority over the language Perl says so? I still don't grasp what the issue is. Someone creates something; someone updates their thing into separate tracks; ... I guess what I don't understand is why some people are so fundamentally angry about it. I would love to have all of the arguments laid out logically. Who cares what the new language is called realistically. I don't understand how it affects some people emotionally. It could be called (taking a quip out of "American Gangster") "Blue Dog Shit". What's the difference? Why the hatred? Why does one care? What ties does one have to the name "Perl" that makes one so angry?	[reply]
Re^5: Think Perl 6 (new book) by hippo (Bishop) on May 18, 2017 at 22:36 UTC
Who cares what the new language is called realistically. I don't understand how it affects some people emotionally. It could be called (taking a quip out of "American Gangster") "Blue Dog Shit". At least that name would not cause the sort of confusion evident in Do i need really to update perl 5 to perl 6?	[reply]
Re^5: Think Perl 6 (new book) by shmem (Chancellor) on May 19, 2017 at 22:59 UTC
I still don't grasp what the issue is. Perl's major release number is locked to 5 because of Perl6. Maybe that's what it is all about. perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'	[reply]
Re^6: Think Perl 6 (new book) by jdporter (Paladin) on May 20, 2017 at 12:30 UTC
Re^5: Think Perl 6 (new book) by 1nickt (Canon) on May 18, 2017 at 22:14 UTC
Because Larry Wall, the inventor and still current authority over the language Perl says so? If that's sufficient for you, you are not Questioning Authority enough. The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply]
Re^6: Think Perl 6 (new book) by stevieb (Canon) on May 18, 2017 at 22:59 UTC
Re^5: Think Perl 6 (new book) by Anonymous Monk on May 19, 2017 at 15:45 UTC
Someone creates something; someone updates their thing into separate tracks; ... If Larry Wall hadn't claimed Perl6 was the new version of Perl from the day after the mug throwing and spent the next ten years delivering nothing while still claiming it would deprecate Perl5, you might be right!	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom