Re^2: Perl segfaults and wont run. Something to do with libperl.so

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl segfaults and wont run. Something to do with libperl.so by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jul 12, 2017 at 02:45 UTC
People might also be downvoting because it replies to the wrong node, as is a monk’s wont, and makes an odd artificial intelligence claim about Linux with its purported “system by which applications (and libraries) can identify the libraries that they need” and is also full “of” pointless, distracting, meaningless, misplaced—dare one® say, even, « Idiotic »—`typesetting` embellishments™. ¡Ω! The problem isn’t being always wrong as much as often being half right Thereby gaining some kind of credibility that is absolutely unearned. Even two-thirds right is a D- and an invitation to collect unemployment benefits.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Perl segfaults and wont run. Something to do with libperl.so by stonecolddevin (Parson) on Jul 12, 2017 at 16:10 UTC
Even two-thirds right is a D- and an invitation to collect unemployment benefits. This is art. Three thousand years of beautiful tradition, from Moses to Sandy Koufax, you're god damn right I'm living in the fucking past	[reply]
Re^3: Perl segfaults and wont run. Something to do with libperl.so by Anonymous Monk on Jul 11, 2017 at 21:39 UTC
its off topic to discuss votes outside of pmdiscuss either way, spam should always be downvoted	[reply]
Re^4: Perl segfaults and wont run. Something to do with libperl.so by shmem (Chancellor) on Jul 11, 2017 at 21:52 UTC
its off topic to discuss votes outside of pmdiscuss My remark doesn't warrant opening a thread in pmdiscuss. either way, spam should always be downvoted The post in question isn't spam. At all. And if you are eager to apply tight rules, the OP is off topic, since it is not so much about perl, but rather about a linker issue. And to that issue, sundialsvc4s post adds valuable information. Get comfortable with reading and evaluating posts for what they carry, don't get biased by your ideas about their author. perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'	[reply]
Re^5: Perl segfaults and wont run. Something to do with libperl.so by Anonymous Monk on Jul 11, 2017 at 22:24 UTC
My remark doesn't warrant opening a thread in pmdiscuss. If you feel that way, then it doesn't warrant a remark in this thread either, in this thread its specifically off topic The post in question isn't spam. It is spam by definition, as is every post by that user , he loves downvotes cause search engines dont care about that his spam spreads his business name which is why he keeps posting around here And if you are eager to apply tight rules, the OP is off topic, since it is not so much about perl, but rather about a linker issue. The OP is on topic, perl linkers issues are perl issues , module installation, perl installation ... all on topic And to that issue, sundialsvc4s post adds valuable information. Get comfortable with reading and evaluating posts for what they carry, don't get biased by your ideas about their author. Sure, I did that, ten years ago, it quickly became obvious such an approach is pointless waste of time as are his posts It doesn't matter if 1/10 or 1/100 of his nodes happen to copy/paste/italicize something vaguely relevant to the topic being discussed, or if 1/700 nodes says something correct, they're still time waster spam and spam needs to be gone why dig through a mountain of shit to find a penny?	[reply]


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks