Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Nodes to Consider: Incorrect Reply Count

by kcott (Chancellor)
on Aug 17, 2017 at 05:02 UTC ( #1197529=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Nodes to Consider: Incorrect Reply Count

Thanks to everyone who replied. Here's a brief summary of those responses:

This is an old problem. It has been reported on several occasions: over the last decade, three of those reports occurred in months beginning with the letter "A".

A little over fifteen years ago, tye reported in "(tye)Re: Node reply count bug?":

"There is currently a table to track number of replies. It is being phased out ... When that work is finished, such problems should disappear."

Maybe that refers to an unrelated Reply Count problem; however, if it doesn't, can anyone advise how that work is progressing?

I had a look through Tidings: I couldn't find anything relevant. I then looked through (historical) Tidings: "Number of Replies clarification Oct 11, 2008 at 03:00 AEDT" (looks like you should adjust for your timezone) was the only related entry I found. Adjusting my User Settings, as that describes, to just show direct replies, tells me that Nodes to Consider post (from my OP) has one reply instead of three: sadly, it still has zero replies (as I originally reported).

— Ken

  • Comment on Re: Nodes to Consider: Incorrect Reply Count

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1197529]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-08-20 06:29 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Asked to put a square peg in a round hole, I would:









    Results (190 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?