in reply to Re: Chronological Ordering of Nodes with the Same Timestamp
in thread Chronological Ordering of Nodes with the Same Timestamp
G'day RonW,
I did consider a number of potential issues, including that one; however, they're all just guesswork on my part. The underlying problem is that #1199161 appeared after #1199162: my expectation was for the reverse order.
[It appears from ++jdporter's response, that the createtime was the same for both. I don't know how that specifically relates to timestamp.]
— Ken
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion