|
|
|
Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
| PerlMonks |
Re: A couple of ideas for dealing with votebotsby $code or die (Deacon) |
| on Oct 19, 2001 at 17:54 UTC ( [id://120091]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.
As I see it, the problem with votebots is not that they might affect XP. And in fact that was the whole point of the node that you refer to in your opening sentence. Frankly, a couple of -- votes is hardly going to make my XP drop significantly. It's the fact that votebots go out and "distriminately" vote up or down certain users. Votebots don't have brains. They don't evaluate the content of a post before voting. They just do it. And it's sad. If someone doesn't like what I say, I don't mind if they downvote me, maybe I'll learn something, maybe we'll agree to disagree. I can come to no such happy conclusion with a votebot. I don't care about the XP, but I can see how it can be annoying if a perfectly reasonable post is downvoted. It doesn't matter if it's only one or two votes - It won't affect your XP, especially if other people are ++ing the node. But the fact that someone might use multiple logins or a votebot to manipulate the rep of a node of mine is upsetting. What's wrong with one node one vote? I'd be happy to stop hearing about votebots. Whatever counter-measures are introduced, someone with a bit of free time will come up with a way around them. And the whole discussion will start again. Simon Flack ($code or die) $,=reverse'"ro_';s,$,\$,;s,$,lc ref sub{},e;$, =~y'_"' ';eval"die";print $_,lc substr$@,0,3;
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||