Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Check multiple lines exist in a record

by sundialsvc4 (Abbot)
on Mar 26, 2018 at 17:55 UTC ( #1211795=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Check multiple lines exist in a record
in thread Check multiple lines exist in a record

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
  • Comment on Re^5: Check multiple lines exist in a record

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Check multiple lines exist in a record
by johngg (Canon) on Mar 27, 2018 at 06:35 UTC
    if that is the entire extent of your opinion

    Far from it!

    I found that particular statement "hilarious" because you seem to waste an inordinate amount of your valuable time italicising, bolding and underscoring your posts. Perhaps you would do better to devote that time to writing and posting code that compiles and runs to produce the required results, which you should also post to demonstrate those skills that you so often allude to. Giving you the benefit of the doubt, you might have done this on occasion but I can't recall any instance where you have.

    Going back to the "extemporaneous" solution you originally posted, there's nothing particularly wrong with the approach. The execution, however, leaves a lot to be desired, e.g. initialising my @lines = []; gives us an array whose first element is an empty anonymous array rather than an empty array. The prevalence of these "beginner's" mistakes render those of your posts containing code worthless and dangerously misleading for genuine beginners who visit this site.

    I am actually considerably older than 41, having started my IT career in 1977. I am now retired but still enjoy tinkering with code, Perl code in particular, and producing solutions to help others.

    Cheers,

    JohnGG

Re^6: Check multiple lines exist in a record
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Mar 26, 2018 at 19:03 UTC

    *Thirty or so. The few upvotes you gain are from new monks who know no better or are pity votes from those who cannot stand the spectacle of YAH. I suppose I RFC:MUST amend my directive created specifically for you, COGTFO, to WCOGTFO. Unambiguously: you are the laziest, worst contributor here and I'd take 10 Wassercratses and Logicuses EACH in place of you.

      ... I'd take 10 ... and [He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named]ses EACH in place of you.

      (Gasp!) Your Mother! Don't say that! Don't even think that! The only advantage of mumble over sundialsvc4 is that the former no longer infests these precincts in any guise. That blessing is squandered if we beckon him back, even backhandedly. Speak of the devil...


      Give a man a fish:  <%-{-{-{-<

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1211795]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2021-04-17 23:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?