Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Can I check if a loop's scope is entered for the first time? (Devel::Callsite)

by TheDamian (Vicar)
on May 07, 2018 at 05:03 UTC ( [id://1214136]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Can I check if a loop's scope is entered for the first time? (Devel::Callsite)
in thread Can I check if a loop's scope is entered for the first time?

Well, that took longer than I expected. ;-)

I just uploaded a new release of Var::Pairs (version 0.003005)
that solves the problem of resetting an iterator on premature termination
of the surrounding loop. It does so by using Scope::Upper::reap()
to install a "destructor" for each iterator when execution leaves
the surrounding scope.

Take another look; I think it's likely this technique would also work for you.

Damian

  • Comment on Re^4: Can I check if a loop's scope is entered for the first time? (Devel::Callsite)
  • Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Can I check if a loop's scope is entered for the first time? (Devel::Callsite)
by TheDamian (Vicar) on May 07, 2018 at 06:09 UTC
    I think it's likely this technique would also work for you.

    In fact, more than just likely...

    sub from (&$) { use Devel::Callsite qw< callsite context >; use Scope::Upper qw< reap UP >; my ($iterator_source) = @_; # Uniquely identify this call, according to its lexical context... my $ID = callsite() . context(); # Install the iterator... state %iterator_for; $iterator_for{$ID} //= $iterator_source->(); # Install destructor for iterator at end of caller's block... reap { delete $iterator_for{$ID} } UP UP; # Iterate... return $iterator_for{$ID}->($_[1]); } for my $limit (reverse 1..5) { while ( from{countdown($limit)} my $a ) { print "$a: "; } print "\n"; } sub countdown{ my $val = shift; my $iter = sub { if ($val--) { $_[0]=$val; return 1; } return; # stop iteration }; return $iter; }

      What the heck...I just uploaded another new release of Var::Pairs
      (version 0.004000), which lets you write this:

      use Var::Pairs; sub countdown { my $n = shift; return sub { return if $n < 0; # Indicates iterator exhausted return $n--; # Next value iterated } } for my $limit (reverse 1..5) { while (my ($a) = each_value countdown($limit)) { print $a, ':'; } say q{}; }

      ...which is very close to what you wanted, I believe.

      (And, yes, the each_value() subroutine is doing a lot of very hard paddling
      under the surface to correctly ignore all those repeated calls to countdown($limit)
      in the while loop. ;-)

      And, obviously, it would be far more efficient to write the iteration:
      for my $limit (reverse 1..5) { my $iter = countdown($limit); while (my ($a) = each_value $iter) { print $a, ':'; } say q{}; }

      Damian

        Hi Damian,

        > And, obviously, it would be far more efficient to write the iteration:

        Indeed. :-/ But it seems to work. :)

        Many thanks and sorry for the slow communication, but job is very demanding at the moment.

        ( I should have checked CPAN for "scope" and I'm not a big fan of XS dependencies but after I saw that dave_the_m is one of the maintainers, it might be canonical. ;-)

        I'll certainly have a closer look into it and will come back to it later... :)

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
        Wikisyntax for the Monastery

        Wouldn't it be better to wrap the hard paddle?

        sub each_value (&); ... while (my ($a) = each_value {countdown($limit)}) { print $a, ':'; }

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1214136]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2025-05-22 05:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?
    erzuuliAnonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.