Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re: Re: Another posible initializer

by Fletch (Bishop)
on Dec 11, 2001 at 08:18 UTC ( #130857=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Another posible initializer
in thread Testing array of hash values

You're quite right. I was thinking more of:

my %p; @p{ qw( a b c ) } = (1)x3;
where you're initializing to a given value (like 1 or "on") rather than undef.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Another posible initializer
by dvergin (Monsignor) on Dec 11, 2001 at 11:55 UTC
    Yes indeedy. So then, to complete this exercise and return to your very legitimate concern above about maintaining this code if the number of arguments changes, we can use:
    my %p; my @keys = qw( a b c ); @p{@keys} = (1) x @keys;
    and slice assignment will take care of itself if we change the key list.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://130857]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (6)
As of 2023-09-28 10:18 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found