Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: (that's not the issue here)

by Anonymous Monk
on Dec 27, 2001 at 02:38 UTC ( [id://134499]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: (that's not the issue here)
in thread Oregon Supreme Court declines to hear my case

merlyn says:
And you fail to draw the distinction I made yesterday. This is important to the Perl community because it is me. There's no point in bringing up what would happen if an "unfamous monk" posted a story similar to this

You sense of self-importance is truly astounding.It appears Ovid's response was entirely mistaken as far as your motives for posting are concerned. It isn't about the law at all. Its all about you. Your post's only import here being that the personal problems and hardships endured are **yours** and not some rank and file member of the community?? Wow. I don't believe you even see yourself as _part_ of the community, you seem to hold yourself as somehow outside and above the community.

As for claims by Randal and others that he was only doing his job here are a couple of excerpts from his interviews by police and an Intel superior. For full context please go and read everything for yourself including the police reports and trial transcripts.

reports court
Detective Lazenby's report:
I asked Randal why he would need forty to fifty passwords and he said, "I needed them in case they caught me doing it and knew they would shut me down so the more passwords I had, the longer I could continue doing what I wanted to do."
Rich Cower's report:
Randal was asked why he was running the Crack process, and he replied it was to keep his access open should his account on Brillig be found and subsequently terminated. If the Brillig account had been discovered, he needed another place to run the "gate" program, and Crack would give him access to a system to do that.
Rich Cower's report:
I asked when he had started using Brillig for his "gate" process. Randal had moved the process to Brillig about 5 or 6 months ago, after this process was discovered on a system named Mink. He mentioned he was told not to run it on Mink and at this time he moved it to Hermes, which he found too slow for his needs. He then changed it slightly, and moved it back to Mink where it was found for a second time. This occurrence resulted in the Mink system administrator to remove his account [at Randal's request according to court transcrips], and Randal then moved the process to Brillig. I asked when his contract an authorized access to Brillig had ended, he responded with sometime in Oct/Nov/Dec of 92. He admitted he knew it was a violated of policy to do this, but did it because he needed this access to respond quickly to email. Randal explained that Rich Cower had put roadblocks up in the form of policy and software to make what he wanted to do impossible.
Rich Cower's report:
I asked how he had obtained the SSD password file. Randal explained that when he cracked passwords on the Brillig system, he had obtained a password of a user named RONB. RONB also had an account on SSD, and Randal admitted to using the RONB user name and password to access SSD. Once Randal was on the SSD system impersonating RONB, he could easily take the password file.
Randal's own words in the fors-faq:
As I have already said in this forum before, I answered 'yes' to the prosecutor's question of 'so you did this for personal gain?', when in fact, what I was thinking of was 'well, it was to keep my employment at Intel, and that benefits me personally, so yes.'

I believe Randal was very afraid that he was being accused of something dire and serious like espionage in those initial interviews and he wanted to assure everyone that was not the case. He told the truth. The truths he told then do not align with the stories he tells today of standard operating procedure for sysadmins in the 80's. He was NOT just "doing his job". He was doing things he was expressly forbidden to do. He was NOT just trying help out and secure the system like some white knight. What he was doing was for his own benefit. Not selling secrets true but certainly not for atruistic reasons. He had terminated his own SSD contract two months early due to disagreements in decisions and policy there. Now much later under a different contract with a different division he saw a way to both get back at certain people there and thought he could win back some respect and his job at SSD. Just doing his job. Please.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: (that's not the issue here)
by herveus (Prior) on Dec 27, 2001 at 20:32 UTC
    Howdy!

    I find Randal's sense of self-importance to be plainly justified on its face. To be "astounded" by it shows (optimisticly) deep ignorance of his role in the history and development of Perl. Alternate interpretations of "astonishment" carry far more pejorative implications, particularly for an Anonymous Coward.

    yours,
    Michael

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://134499]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-18 18:03 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found