![]() |
|
"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Poor Man's Perl6 Exegesis (you get what you pay for)by mikfire (Deacon) |
on Jan 24, 2002 at 23:45 UTC ( [id://141297]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I am uncertain if I should update my previous node or not.
As I am attacking a seperate portion of this, I believe I
am correct in making a new node.
What does this do? I have been over the related Apocalypse and Exegesis ( part 3 ) and I think the idea here is to allow myimport to be called with lists instead of arrays. According to TheDamian in Exegesis 3, page 1, the @ will cause perl6 to expect either an array or an array reference as the parameter. If we were to declare a perl6 sub like this: and called it like this: we would generate an error ( at compile time? ). If we really want foo to be called with a list, we need to put the flattening star in the sub definition:
But, later on in the same tome, we are told that this will have the standard perl5 affect of slurping the remainder of the parameters. I am guessing this to be an error on BrentDax's part. I believe BrentDax was attempting to allow myimport to be called with lists, but forgot that the flattening star would behave exactly as we expect from perl5. If I have missed something, I would really appreciate being corrected.
update: Changed a bit of wording in the last paragraph.
Mik
In Section
Meditations
|
|