Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things

Re: Comparison between Perl and Ksh

by mandog (Curate)
on Mar 07, 2002 at 01:32 UTC ( #149903=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Comparison between Perl and Ksh

Well your manager may be a moron, but I'm not sure "all the guys that like perl a lot say that it is better." will be very convincing....

Maybe it would be convincing to post to a shell scripting group so you can say. "The guys on the shell group say if you ***must*** pick one, perl is better."

It sounds kinda empirical to say stuff like:

CPAN has __ hundred thousand modules and libraries, all with search able on line, documentation and the biggest shell script repository has ___ hundred scripts.

Perl is more secure it has sandboxes like java and taint mode, and only interpolates once.

There are ____ books on perl at O'Relly and ___ books on shell

It takes ___ human (manager) readable lines of perl to do task ____ x and ____ lines of funky shell to do the same task

email: mandog

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Comparison between Perl and Ksh
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 08, 2002 at 15:08 UTC
    Another good manager-oriented comparison is:

    There are ____ (517) listings for Perl programmers on (or wherever), ____ (24) listings for ksh programmers. More people are using Perl these days than ksh, and longer term, it'll be easier and probably cheaper to find a Perl programmer to maintain the code than a ksh programmer.

    Managers like hearing that 'other people are doing it.'

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://149903]
[Discipulus]: someone can explain last faq by jdporter? if humor i missed it

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (10)
As of 2018-06-22 07:44 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (122 votes). Check out past polls.