Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re5: perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider

by belg4mit (Prior)
on Mar 14, 2002 at 20:43 UTC ( #151825=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: •Re: Re: Re: perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider
in thread perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider

Yes for PerlApp, no for PerlSvc, but as I've said before there are plenty of free utilities to let you wrap whatever the heck you want as a service.

PerlApp and perl2exe are pretty indistinguishable in my experience save three things:

  • Indy builds perl2exe on his machine with a really weird setup (think perl -V) and this can potentially bite you
  • perl2exe does some nasty stuff in the name of "DWIM" (at least for those not doing complex things). For example there is no way to get a runtime use, eval "use Foo"; does not work.
  • The perl2exe license gets tied to a username and must be run by that user.
  • --
    perl -pe "s/\b;([st])/'\1/mg"

    Replies are listed 'Best First'.
    Re: Re5: perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider
    by drewbie (Chaplain) on Mar 14, 2002 at 21:01 UTC
    • The perl2exe license gets tied to a username and must be run by that user.

      UGH! Talk about a very restrictive license! Well, needless to say I'll never use perl2exe. I'd much rather use the free tools, or pay ActiveState. I don't mind paying for commercial software that works and gives me a net benefit. But free is always good too. :-)

    Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Node Status?
    node history
    Node Type: note [id://151825]
    help
    Chatterbox?
    and dust plays in a shaft of sunlight...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (4)
    As of 2018-07-16 04:38 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?















      Results (332 votes). Check out past polls.

      Notices?