in reply to Re: Re: don't { use Perl }
in thread don't { use Perl }
Oh, I certainly didn't say there is no value in knowing more
languages. But the added value of knowing more goes down
quickly. That is, you get more value out of knowing your
first language than out of knowing your second, which has
more value than knowing your third, etc.
I also made the exception for "small domain" languages. Languages that are suited to do a specific task very well. Examples of "small domain" languages are TeX, sed, sed, gnuplot, but also "languages inside languages", like printf formats, pack formats.
Maybe it's just the way I work, but generally when I need to solve a problem, I first think up an algorithm, and a general outline of the program. Only then I write a program. It will mostly be in Perl (because that's the language I like), but it will lead to a similar program as the one I would have written in, for instance, C. Details will certainly differ, but not the approach.
Abigail
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: don't { use Perl }
by Jenda (Abbot) on Jun 11, 2002 at 15:38 UTC |
In Section
Meditations