Re: Re: a bit more about unanswered nodes.

[Chicken]

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

[chromatic]

Yes and no. There are ways to do something like that, but it's not an ideal solution, nor do I think that it's a good idea in this case. You haven't convinced me that it's necessary. I also don't find you very trustworthy, as your posting history as Chicken to date finds you complaining about the XP system, admitting that you have multiple accounts, asking for extra privileges, and trying to start arguments with other posters.

You already have the tools to accomplish this. If you can pull it off and it proves to be of value, I'm willing to reconsider.

(I am speaking only for myself and not for any editor, developer, or god on the site.)

[jeffa]

Your comments speak for me as well. I would like to see Chicken implement these ideas instead of just talking about them - actually, i would really like to see less posts from Chicken and more from Courage.

jeffa

L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)

[ignatz]

There's nothing stopping you from creating a web site of your own and linking to it from your homenode. The great thing about the web is that if you don't like how someone else does something you can always do it yourself.

()-()
 \"/
  `