Keep It Simple, Stupid | |
PerlMonks |
Re: On Responsible Considerationsby mirod (Canon) |
on Jul 10, 2002 at 22:03 UTC ( [id://180885]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I agree with the idea that reaping a node is serious stuff and that it should be done only in serious cases. Editing a node though, especially when it requires only adding <code> or formating tags (gosh! why don't people just use the preview button and try to figure out why their post looks ugly?) is a much less serious matter. I still think that it should not be done without the node being considered and some edit votes cast on it (I usually wait for 3 edit and no keep). This is a simple measure to help preventing the power of editing to corrupt me: I only edit posts that other monks want to be edited, I don't decide it myself. Changing the title of a node is a grey area. In most case a /msg to the author of the node, pointing out why a change in title would be nice, might be better than considering it. Update: In any case, I think that the best way to get a post fixed is by messaging the author, as footpad did with this one actually ;--). Funny enough I did not remember Messaging authors of baddly formated posts by you which I posted a long time ago, but I guess I am consistent on this! --
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|