Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Funny html rendering after recent PM changes

by rah (Monk)
on Oct 18, 2002 at 02:02 UTC ( [id://206199]=monkdiscuss: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

I don't know if anyone else is experiencing this, but thought I would mention it. After a bit if a hiatus, ironically to focus my time on a perl project for work, I noticed some odd PM behaviors upon my return. I frequently encounter pages that fail to wrap to the width of my browser window. This seems to happen at random, in any section. It's very annoying because it spreads the page out to about 50% wider than my browser window. So I need to scroll right several inches to see the CB. It does this using IE5/6 or NS4 on Win2k and OSX.

Has anyone else been experiencing this? Am I correct that it began after some fairly recent changes (~3 weeks or so). Any ideas, suggestions? Can it be fixed?

  • Comment on Funny html rendering after recent PM changes

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Funny html rendering after recent PM changes
by hossman (Prior) on Oct 18, 2002 at 07:38 UTC

    Are you sure you didn't play with your Code Wrap settings?

    Does the problem go away if you log out?

Re: Funny html rendering after recent PM changes
by Popcorn Dave (Abbot) on Oct 18, 2002 at 05:06 UTC
    I've encountered that too, but it's usually a case of somebody goes and kicks the server and the next time I come back, the problem is gone.

    And I think I noticed it happening more than 3 weeks ago, but like I said, it goes away, so why worry about it too much?

    There is no emoticon for what I'm feeling now.

      it's usually a case of somebody goes and kicks the server and the next time I come back, the problem is gone.

      No, we don't kick the server. An editor fixes the node that is improperly formatted (usually by replacing PRE tags with CODE tags).

              - tye
        I didn't see any particular pattern. Certainly nothing like Mr. Muskrat's example which I think I would have recognized as the problem. But the PRE tags make sense. (as I just demonstrated to myself when I tried to include <PRE> in this message without escaping it). Any text just over the "border" of a frame the size of my browser window would force it to stretch and resuire a right scroll. Thanks tye for the explaination. Now if we can just get everyone to preview, editor intervention won't be necessary.
Re: Funny html rendering after recent PM changes
by greenFox (Vicar) on Oct 18, 2002 at 08:13 UTC
    I see this as well, I thought it was some dodginess in my CSS theme, it hasn't happened often enough for me to either pin point exactly what the problem is or get frustrated enough to mention it...

    --
    Life is a tale told by an idiot -- full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. William Shakespeare, Macbeth

Re: Funny html rendering after recent PM changes
by Mr. Muskrat (Canon) on Oct 18, 2002 at 13:11 UTC

    I've noticed it as well. It's usually due to a really long string of characters that doesn't get broken up like URLs usually are.

    Feel free to edit the above, since my point has been made.

    Edit by tye to add READMORE

      Ah. i thought that it was just to ironic that this happens to me right when I'm reading a node about it. Sigh. The universe is not quite as silly as I had thought it to be for a moment.

      Cheers,
      Erik

      Light a man a fire, he's warm for a day. Catch a man on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchet

      Thanks tye. I should have done that when I posted it.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: monkdiscuss [id://206199]
Approved by grinder
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others admiring the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-12-12 17:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Which IDE have you been most impressed by?













    Results (65 votes). Check out past polls.