|XP is just a number|
Re: Re: Re: Tk vs. wxPerlby dree (Monsignor)
|on Dec 15, 2002 at 15:34 UTC||Need Help??|
The above node Re: Tk vs. wxPerl is obviously IMVHO, so *for me* procedural programming is easy than OOP.
For example, *for me* is easier to write the hello world written in Tk
than wx one:
So IMVHO to programming wxPerl you have to know more Perl than to programming with Tk.
Documentation issue: Tk has 3 books from O'Reilly, several chapters inside other books (Advanced Perl Programming, Professional Perl Development, others?), 1 newsgroup with years of posts, searchable with groups.google.com or with www.peltk.org, years of development with tons of scripts aka large community.
wxPerl unfortunately has only a mailing list without a working search engine and few excellent tutorials.
But Perl/Tk is years old and wxPerl is young. This scenario is IMVHO the normality.
DLL issue: my dir command on win32 says those dimensions. Only this.
Update: fixed typos