Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

RE: The Threading Dilemma

by young perlhopper (Scribe)
on Jul 22, 2000 at 22:30 UTC ( #23912=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to The Threading Dilemma

I like the first solution, but due to the inconvenience in having to figure out node numbers, maybe you could introduce some linking 'macros'. For example, if I want to link to the last node i was at, [last-node] would do it. If i'm typing at the chatterbox, [this-node] might be useful. In threaded discussions, [parent-node], [prev-sibling], [next-sibling], might be moderately useful...

Would this be practical? I'm not sure how the architecture of perlmonks would make this easy/hard. Personally I think the [last-node] has the most potential, simply view the page you want to comment on, then go to the discussion and paste it in.

-Mark

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: The Threading Dilemma
by turnstep (Parson) on Jul 23, 2000 at 02:11 UTC

    I like this, but I'd suggest simpler macros:

    [here] [last] [top] or [parent]

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://23912]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (5)
As of 2020-02-24 12:37 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    What numbers are you going to focus on primarily in 2020?










    Results (104 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?