Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Determine if script is already running

by Limbic~Region (Chancellor)
on Mar 03, 2003 at 20:51 UTC ( [id://240154]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Determine if script is already running
in thread Determine if script is already running

Nitrox,
As I indicated in my first post. Using a lock file by itself, regardless of type, will not guarantee only a single copy of a script is running in Unix. This is because it is possible to delete a file that is locked. Using the /tmp directory most likely increases the odds of deletion by its nature. The subsequent instance of the script is able to create and lock the new file - and now you have two copies running. You really need to have multiple methods for validation and checking the process table is a good place to start.

Cheers - L~R

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Determine if script is already running

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Determine if script is already running
by Nitrox (Chaplain) on Mar 04, 2003 at 21:44 UTC
    This bugs me, why does *nix allow deletion of an open and locked file? On Win32 a file can't be deleted until the ref count == 0, is there a way to explicitly set this in *nix?

    -Nitrox

      Nitrox,
      Not that I know of. There are things you can do to reduce the probability that the file will be accidentally deleted - security through obscurity. These things include:

    • Changing the directory where the file resides permissions to 000.
    • Use non-typical characters in the file name such as a space, asterick, or worse.
    • Use alarm for the original script to check if the file has been deleted and re-create. * This requires a lot of overhead to try and compete with the race condition.
    • Use hard links (not symbolic) so that more than one file combined equal your lock file

      Even with these suggestions, there is not the 100% guarantee. Sometimes you need decide that the probability is an acceptable risk and move on. If you are totally against checking the process table - semaphores may be the way to go.

      Cheers - L~R

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://240154]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-11-04 08:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    chatterbot is...






    Results (20 votes). Check out past polls.