Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options

Re^2: POD as a general documentation system

by Aristotle (Chancellor)
on Mar 31, 2003 at 02:44 UTC ( #246838=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: POD as a general documentation system
in thread POD as a general documentation system

You could read RFC 1 just as well if it was written as POD.

POD has hardly changed during the last 2 decades as well, right?

And the little bit of markup introduced by POD allows one to make the document navigatable by means other than scrolling and searching for patterns.

Metadata rocks. POD keeps the difference between marked up text and plain ASCII very minimal. POD rocks.

Makeshifts last the longest.

  • Comment on Re^2: POD as a general documentation system

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: POD as a general documentation system
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Mar 31, 2003 at 09:00 UTC
    POD has hardly changed during the last 2 decades as well, right?

    POD didn't even exist 2 decades ago. In fact, POD is less than a decade old, it came with perl5. And, given what's going to happen with perl6, I wouldn't want to bet money on "POD will not change the next decade".

    Besides, all POD tools are written in Perl. Having to install a dinosaur like Perl just to be able to deal with general documentation doesn't rock - it sucks. It's hardly any worse than requiring people to install Word or some other tool that reads Word format.


      But you don't! Any Joe Random User will understand what

      means. There's rarely a lot more markup in POD and the spec is very simple - even if it changes in the future, the basic syntax (=FOO) is not going to change. The fact that the tools in existence are written in Perl is a red herring. In their absence, less works just as well. Of course the format is so simple you can easily write parsers in another language. I've used sed once.

      I did mix up the "two decades" thing - code and docs were wrapped before Perl5 too, but I forgot the Perl4 way of doing that was *roff.

      Makeshifts last the longest.

        You are over estimating Joe Random User. =head1 isn't clear at all, let alone =head2. Maybe he would have understood =title and =section. And you really think Joe Random User is going to understand =over? Or L<text|name/sec>?

        And if you are going to use a pager to read POD anyway, you'd be better off it it was written in plain ASCII.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://246838]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-07-17 04:19 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?

    Results (354 votes). Check out past polls.