Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE (3): Voting scale

by Ozymandias (Hermit)
on Aug 09, 2000 at 06:45 UTC ( #26938=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE (3): Voting scale
in thread Voting scale

Read it again.

If a lot of people give your node ++ votes, you get more points than if only a few people vote ++. A higher percentage of those Rep will be translated into XP.

BUT it is currently set so that one person voting -- has a 1/3 chance of of actually knocking down your XP. No matter how low it goes.

What this suggestion does is level the playing field. In addition to getting more points for high positive reps, you now get more points knocked off if you get a really high NEGATIVE rep.

In other words, the truth is the exact OPPOSITE of what you said. Right now, people voting ++ have a greater effect on your XP than people voting --. This suggestion rebalances that, so that the effect is the same either way.

- email Ozymandias

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: (5): Voting scale
by tilly (Archbishop) on Aug 09, 2000 at 06:51 UTC
    Ah, right you are. It just showed one side of it.

    It has been a long day, I misread that and I have been having a lot of conversations on the side.

    My apologies.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://26938]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2020-03-30 20:29 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    To "Disagree to disagree" means to:









    Results (176 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?