Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: •Re: Re: CGI versus CGI::* modules

by hardburn (Abbot)
on Aug 01, 2003 at 13:24 UTC ( #279951=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to •Re: Re: CGI versus CGI::* modules
in thread CGI versus CGI::* modules

I agree that CGI.pm is great for getting away from hand-rolled solutions. It may not be perfect, but you could do far, far worse.

Handling cookies is nice, but there again, other modules exist that handle that specifically. Sticky fields and XHTML aren't a concern for me, because I use templates extensiviely for any non-trivial CGI.

That's interesting about the dynamic loading, I didn't know about that.

----
I wanted to explore how Perl's closures can be manipulated, and ended up creating an object system by accident.
-- Schemer

Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated

  • Comment on Re: •Re: Re: CGI versus CGI::* modules

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://279951]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (4)
As of 2021-05-12 03:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Perl 7 will be out ...





    Results (124 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?