Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much

RE: Section Order on Newest Nodes

by turnstep (Parson)
on Aug 29, 2000 at 16:09 UTC ( #30114=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Section Order on Newest Nodes

I can see your point, but the current system works for me because 95% of the replies are in answer to a Seekers of Perl Wisdom question (or a Meditation or Perl Monks Discussion like this one) and so they seem to "belong" with the others. I don't really have strong feelings one way or the other, however, and I may only prefer the current way due to it always being that way for me. At the very least, I'd like to keep the Breaking News and the Q&A sections at the bottom, as they are different enough from the other sections to warrant it, IMO. Both Tutorials and Cool Uses are rare enough that moving them would not really bother me much. My pet peeve is people who change the title of their replies, so that one cannot tell what thread it belongs to unless you read all the root nodes and memorize the titles as you go. True threading on the Newest Nodes page would make a very nice feature and fix that problem.

my TwoCents;

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: Section Order on Newest Nodes
by nuance (Hermit) on Aug 29, 2000 at 19:16 UTC
    Yes, yes, yes, yes yes!
    $what_she_said *= 10000l;
    I really don't like changed subjects, it makes conversations much too hard to follow.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://30114]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2022-05-29 09:40 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?

    Results (101 votes). Check out past polls.