Re: mason and embperl

There are a number of Reasons to use Mason and EmbPerl. But the most important I can find. Security! And as I see the other benefits. Stability!

The most important reason for a company to give up a eval:ing thing. Support!

But these are just opinions!

JanneVee

Comment on Re: mason and embperl

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(Ovid) RE(2): mason and embperl by Ovid (Cardinal) on Sep 03, 2000 at 02:20 UTC
JanneVee: considering your eloquent defense of COBOL in Perl: Survival of the Fittest, I surprised you didn't recommend COBOLScript. :) Cheers, Ovid	[reply]
(JanneVee) RE(3): mason and embperl by JanneVee (Friar) on Sep 03, 2000 at 04:13 UTC
I surprised you didn't recommend COBOLScript. My eloquent defense was based on the principle of what certain things are made for. COBOL -> heavy business processing. Perl -> process large amounts of information. This means that for HTML templating I think that Perl is better suited than COBOL for the particular task. Actually I don't like COBOL either, I just believe it has a place like FORTRAN. /JanneVee	[reply]
RE (tilly) something: mason and embperl by tilly (Archbishop) on Sep 03, 2000 at 04:26 UTC
Both Fortran and COBOL have a place - generating disasters for saner languages to clean up. :-)	[reply]


Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
	PerlMonks

Re: mason and embperl

:)