Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks httptech
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Being helpful to a fault?

by Aristotle (Chancellor)
on Dec 11, 2003 at 07:18 UTC ( [id://314020]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.


in reply to Being helpful to a fault?

  1. Certainly. A plugin system for a program comes to mind immediately, where plugins are modules with a specific interface and are added simply by dropping them in a directory.

    "Why would anyone want to do X?" is never a good reason to advise against it. If you can say "almost all the people who do X suffer Y" then you do have a case. I am reminded of my recent rereading of Mark-Jason Dominus' Critique of the Perl 6 RFC Process; specifically, this passage:

    People would frequently send me mail asking me to add a certain feature, such as timed expiration of cached data. I would reply that I didn't want to do that, because it would slow down the module for everyone, and it would not help the next time I got a similar but slightly different request, such as a request for data that expires when it has been used a fixed number of times. The response was invariably along the lines of "But what would anyone want to do that for?" And then the following week I would get mail from someone else asking for expiration of data after it had been used a fixed number of times, and I would say that I didn't want to put this in because it wouldn't help people with the problem of timed expiration and the response would be exactly the same.
  2. Which way I'll answer depends on how much information the poster gives. If I can clearly see that he's getting himself into trouble, I'll point out that it shouldn't be done this way first and explain why, and then add the solution requested merely as a point of interest, hoping that the poster will learn how to do what he wanted while steering clear of that solution for the case he asked about. If there isn't that much information, or if it isn't clearly a bad idea but just could be done better, then I'll answer the question and add a few words on the advantages of doing it another way. If I can only suspect that a certain bad idea is the motivation, then along with the answer to the question I might add something along the lines of "you're not trying to do X, are you? if so, then you shouldn't, do Y instead" or ".. if so, then we can probably point out a better way if you give us more information".

Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://314020]
help
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Notices?
    hippoepoptai's answer Re: how do I set a cookie and redirect was blessed by hippo!
    erzuuliAnonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.