Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

RE: RE (tilly) 2: Randomize an array

by BooK (Curate)
on Sep 08, 2000 at 00:46 UTC ( #31480=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to RE (tilly) 2: Randomize an array
in thread Randomize an array

I completely agree with you. 0 should not be here. It's just that we talked about

sort { rand(3) - 1 } @array
at the september 1999 meeting.

I just remembered the sort rand trick and shared it. So here comes an updated version:

sort { (-1,1)[rand 2] } @array

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(tilly) (still imperfect): Randomize an array
by tilly (Archbishop) on Sep 08, 2000 at 07:05 UTC
    I was trying to figure out how to explain why this was going to give a perfect sort, and I realized that in fact this trick simply cannot give a perfect sort for an array of size larger than 2 when fed an algorithm with bounded performance!

    This is cute.

    As the above makes clear, you are basically making random coin flips until it spits out an answer. If the array has n entries, there is some maximum number of flips, say k, that you could be asked for.

    Turning it around on its head I could just ask you up front to make k coin flips, then feed that into the algorithm, and get an answer. Now there are 2^k possible sequences that you could give me, and they are all equally likely. So if you write in base 2, the probability of any particular permutation is 2^(-k) times the number of sequences that gave that permutation.

    What that is I don't care. What I do care about is that when written out in base 2 that probability is a decimal that terminates after at most k places. But for each permutation the probability we really want is 1/n!, and if n is bigger than 2 then n! is divisible by 3 which is *not* a power of two so 1/n! has to be (base 2) an infinite repeating decimal!

    In other words I may not, without calculating it, have any idea how your anwer will be biased, but in fact it is!

    ObTrivia: A somewhat similar counting argument manages to show that the 400 year Gregorian calendar repeats days of the week, but cannot divide a particular day of the month between them. However it takes explicit calculation to show that the 13'th falls on Friday more than 1 day in 7.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://31480]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2023-12-05 07:33 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    What's your preferred 'use VERSION' for new CPAN modules in 2023?

    Results (26 votes). Check out past polls.