Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation

Re: Re: Perl module problem

by ysth (Canon)
on Dec 21, 2003 at 21:55 UTC ( #316248=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Perl module problem
in thread Perl module problem

I frequently prefer to put the use for a module that is used only in one sub in the body of the sub. The only problem I could see with this approach is if anything is imported; in that case I would agree that it belongs at the top, since it affects the whole package.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Perl module problem
by djantzen (Priest) on Dec 22, 2003 at 02:20 UTC

    There aren't any negative consequences codewise from doing it, even if you are importing stuff. For example, occasionally when debugging I'll throw use Data::Dumper; print Dumper $foo in the middle of some code. Dumper is an imported subroutine in this usage and works just fine so long as it's used in the same package it's imported into.

    The problem is not with writing functional code but with writing readable, maintainable code. Novice programmers, probably like the AnonyMonk here, might read such code and think mistakenly that use works at runtime like require or eval "use Foo";. Moreover, someone maintaining your code, even if an experienced Perl programmer, isn't generally going to scan your codebase looking for embedded use statements because it's customary to place them at the top of the file, and that could lead to confusion, for example in case of conflicts with imported symbols. In short, yeah you can get away with it, but it introduces a maintenance risk.

    "The dead do not recognize context" -- Kai, Lexx

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://316248]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-07-19 02:41 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?

    Results (400 votes). Check out past polls.