Re: Self Extracting Perl Archive 0.4

by Anonymous Monk

on Jan 01, 2004 at 13:00 UTC ( [id://318106]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

And praise tell, why should I use this rather than PAR?

Comment on Re: Self Extracting Perl Archive 0.4

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Self Extracting Perl Archive 0.4 by Anonymous Monk on Jan 01, 2004 at 13:27 UTC
I would venture a guess, that maybe for the same reason you should use par, so the question becomes why should you use this rather than par :)?	[reply]
Same Language, Different Market :-) by #include (Curate) on Jan 01, 2004 at 18:22 UTC
I'm not really trying to do the same thing as PAR. I'm shooting for something that can be used as a software installation utility, amongst other things. If anything, I'm trying to write something like makeself in Perl. A genius writes code an idiot can understand, while an idiot writes code the compiler can't understand.	[reply]
Re: Same Language, Different Market :-) by Anonymous Monk on Jan 01, 2004 at 20:31 UTC
Yes you are. Maybe you didn't click the links, but there are two things called par. One is PAR, the other is par. You're reinventing par (or ppm, however you want to loook at it).	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://318106]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (3)

As of 2024-12-07 20:21 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?