Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: Is voting/reputation a design decision?

by Ozymandias (Hermit)
on Sep 13, 2000 at 00:30 UTC ( #32184=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: Is voting/reputation a design decision?
in thread Is voting/reputation a design decision?

Sorry, but according to the latest revision of Godwin's law, invoking Hitler deliberately as a means of ending the thread is not allowed. Furthermore, you, as the person who invoked it, have lost. Lost what? I dunno. That's just what it says here in the rulebook.

I mean, some people. One little flame war and they pretend it's got a simple solution. You're like Hitler that way... <G>

- email Ozymandias
  • Comment on RE: RE: Is voting/reputation a design decision?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: Is voting/reputation a design decision?
by myocom (Deacon) on Sep 13, 2000 at 00:53 UTC
    Dammit, that'll teach me to keep up on the latest RFC's. ;-)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://32184]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (5)
As of 2020-03-30 19:58 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    To "Disagree to disagree" means to:









    Results (176 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?