Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re: Possible changes to Voting/XP

by CountZero (Bishop)
on Jan 22, 2004 at 07:17 UTC ( #323112=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Possible changes to Voting/XP

I find it a good proposal, except for the "0" odds of loosing 1 XP for the nodes with high rep. Shouldn't there be a little risk involved? As it now stands there must be sufficient downvotes to reduce the rep of the node to below 4 * $NORM before you again run the risk of loosing XP.

Nothing should be cast in concrete and nobody should be above criticism.


"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Possible changes to Voting/XP
by ysth (Canon) on Jan 22, 2004 at 08:43 UTC
    The "0" odds of losing XP for nodes with high rep is the way it works now, no? I'd rather not see that change. Update: I think my brain was on vacation when I wrote the following sentence; I have no clue what I was thinking. (One effect is to make it harder/impossible to try to move other's nodes down on the best nodes list.)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://323112]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2018-06-23 22:01 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (126 votes). Check out past polls.