Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Why down vote is soo easy?!

by Abigail-II (Bishop)
on Jan 26, 2004 at 00:31 UTC ( [id://324036]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Why down vote is soo easy?!

I think voting should be symmetrical. -- voting have the same rewards/barriers as ++ votes. Due to the social pressure of preferring ++ votes over -- votes, the entire node reputation system is meaningless.

Let me make a bold proposal. To counterbalance the social pressure, making ++ votes should come with a price. Like losing a positive number of XP. Or a rule that your number of ++ votes/day could never be more than twice the number of -- votes, and the other way around as well (with the obvious exception of your first vote).

Abigail

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Why down vote is soo easy?! (illogic)
by tye (Sage) on Jan 26, 2004 at 07:51 UTC

    Due to social pressures to not act like a complete jerk, compliments are preferred to insults. It has made compliments completely meaningless. Now, when someone gives me a compliment, I know that it is only because they feel unfair pressure to not yell insults at me (the possibility that they could do neither is simply unimaginable, which is why every single person I get near all day throws meaningless compliments at me).

    The world would be much better if we were required to insult at least as many people as we compliment...

    ...then the world would be more like... Usenet!

    - tye        

Re: Re: Why down vote is soo easy?!
by Acolyte (Hermit) on Jan 30, 2004 at 22:33 UTC

    "Let me make a bold proposal. To counterbalance the social pressure, making ++ votes should come with a price. Like losing a positive number of XP. Or a rule that your number of ++ votes/day could never be more than twice the number of -- votes, and the other way around as well (with the obvious exception of your first vote). "

    So you'd penalize those making supportive votes on the assumption that they are only being made as a courtesy rather than out of a desire to throw support behind a particular point of view without cluttering the site with a needless "ditto" post? This seems a bit presumptive as to the intent of voters. I personally don't have the gift of reading minds and would never presume to make that kind of judgement...

    Likewise, forcing ++ votes to exceed -- votes assumes that there is less merit in identifying posts that lack worthwhile content, or even contain offensive content, than there is in throwing support behind meritorious posts. If that were true then why do we bother with a Node Reaper? -- votes are a way for the community to identify nodes that deserve his attention.

    The xp system is not broken. Let it be what it is.

    Acolyte
    Studying at the feet of the masters

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://324036]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (8)
As of 2024-04-24 10:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found