Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I'd say that's a matter of interpretation. I did consider the situation where no ETX existed; however, jagexCoder wrote "... packets of interest that are within STX and ETX endings.". Accordingly, I coded for STX and ETX to always be present. Perhaps wait for the OP to clarify this. [Aside: You appear to have removed the original typo, so I don't know what you're apologising for. Regardless, I accept your apology. :-) ] Update:
Oh dear! Having posted this, I see I've also introduced a typo such that it made no sense.
-- Ken In reply to Re^3: Detect STX and ETX hex in received string
by kcott
|
|