Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister  
PerlMonks 
Comment on 
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml )  Need Help?? 
Well, you are not "knowing" you are "guessing"... ... and that's not a good base for designing code. This is unfair, Rolf. I am certainly not claiming to be an expert on the subject, this is why I am saying I may be wrong. But, please, don't say that I am just guessing, I have done a quite a little bit more work than just guessing. I am just admitting that I might be completely wrong, if such is the case, please show me why, and I will be happy to recognize it. What's worse, I also guessed that and and or have the same precedence ... Well, I knew they did not have the same precedence. But my point is that this is probably essentially irrelevant. ... but now take a look what B::Deparse says: ... $a and $b or $c What I am saying: true, i.e. $a and $b, if they are both true, otherwise, $c. Exactly equivalent to $c unless $a and $b; $a or $b and $c True if $a is true. Otherwise, true only if $b and $c are both true. Again, it seems to me that this is exactly equivalent to $b and $c unless $a; In brief, the two deparse examples that you have shown confirm exactly and precisely by lefttoright Boolean interpretation with shortcircuit that I made. Again, I am being very careful on this, I may be completely wrong. But, *please*, don't use this uncertainty to claim that I am just guessing. In reply to Re^5: Looking for discussions of "block after or" syntax error
by Laurent_R

