Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

If you “admire” the system, go for it.   But consider that I have encountered many discussions berating other forums for including downvotes and the ability to “lose” reputation.   Ratings systems can produce anti-social behavior and may drive users away.   Consider, for example:   rating posts but not people; allowing only upvotes; tallying up and down votes separately; counting only positive votes against a user’s reputation (if you choose to track it at the user-level at all).   Consider carefully the social impact of the system that you implement, because it will have an impact, and many users do not tolerate negativity especially when directed personally at them.   The implementation itself is quite trivial, requiring only one (or two) integer counter(s) in both the user and the post/reply record.

If you do implement this, also please provide the ability to search for posts based on, say, minimum number of upvotes.   (Another reason to count ups and downs distinct from one another.)   Where forums provide this capability, I use it a lot ... but I only want to see how many people liked the post or topic.

Bonus points if you implement “rate this post” and/or “rate this thread” with one-or-more individual criteria ... and double bonus-points if we can search on that, too.   As a forum matures and begins to carry hundreds of thousands of entries in its database, “finding(!) the good ’uns” can use all the search-options it can get.   Let there be participant-rating of content, but then, let me do something useful-to-me with this data, like refining my search.   Go further than PerlMonks has done.


In reply to Re: RFC: Emulating the monastery voting system by sundialsvc4
in thread RFC: Emulating the monastery voting system by biohisham

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (1)
As of 2021-07-28 17:51 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?