Hello kcott!

Interesting to hear about your experience teaching students. I am sure the style you introduced might indeed help improve the situation you described. But once you have declared a variable with a prefix, it is no longer optional to remove the prefix. This is why I don't like the idea of a prefix that is part of the variable name. A prefix as a part of the sigil would seem like a better idea. Then it could be made optional.

For example, consider a function called with three references. A scalar reference, a hash reference, and a string reference;

sub func {
   my ( $rs_str, $hr_desktop_info, $ha_files ) = @_; 

  $$rs_string = update_string_ref();
  for ( keys %$hr_desktop_info ) {
     ...
     push @$ha_files, $file;
  }
  ....

}
[download]

I seems to me like the prefixes will introduce too much noise in the source code. In this case, it might be better if only the first line in the function documented the type of the reference, and then subsequent lines could omit the variable name prefix:

sub func {
   my ( $rs_str, $hr_desktop_info, $ha_files ) = @_; 

  $$str = update_string_ref();
  for ( keys %$desktop_info ) {
     ...
     push @$files, $file;
  }
  ....

}
[download]

Of course, the above code is not yet possible. And further it could not easily be made part of Perl in the future. But maybe a new type of prefix could be used, for example $>$, $>%, and $>@ ?

sub func {
   my ( $>$str, $>%desktop_info, $>@files ) = @_; 

  ....

}
[download]

On the other hand, I can see the clash here with the Perl special variable $> (The effective uid of this process). So this syntax might be difficult to implement.

Regarding the last point of your reply. Yes, I agree that if I call func( $var->@* ), the function will indeed receive @$var. But I assumed a function definition on the form

sub func {
  my ( $var ) = @_;
 
  ...

}
[download]

Now, the function would "receive" $var->[0] ( in the sense that $var in the function will be equal $var->[0] of the caller). But I think this (minor) issue of whether the function receives the whole array or only its first item is just a distraction from the main topic of the discussion. So I will not go further into the issue.

---

---

Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!

Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.

Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.

Please read these before you post! —

• How do I compose an effective node title?
• How do I post a question effectively?
• Markup in the Monastery

Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:

a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr

You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)

	For:		Use:
	&		&
	<		&lt;
	>		&gt;
	[		&#91;
	]		&#93;

Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?

See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.