Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Geez...that's more of an example of Google's "Let's be evil" new behavior than a case for using https:

I know that using https seriously impaired the caching on my home squid-cache. On https sites, the caching fell to zero on sites that used https to encrypt the setting.

It used to be that, depending on the site and site-type, I might get a 20-30% speed boost from my home cache mostly in lowering numbers of requests for common items like icons, style sheets and pictures. On news sites, I saw as much 30+%.

I've restored some or most of that by using an SSL-bump proxy to decrypt & store... visiting a few news sites & looking at my caching rates: 25% (396/1557) requests were served via local cache, with 21% (20MB/94MB) of the traffic-by-bytes. Since I don't have Gigabit fiber @ home, that saves a noticeable chunk of time.

My housemate noticed a major speed bump on You-Tube -- relating to the previews -- before, about 20 seconds/page, after, less than 2-3 seconds/page -- related to the previews (and the way they paged forward & back amongst the static preview images.

One of the best example types which I've hit more than once is downloading large CD and/or DVD images from large SW vendors due to my max disk-cache object size being 2GB. One time I pulled down a 700+MB image from Microsoft -- *TWICE* -- having forgotten about the previous download -- nearly 2 months before. Couldn't figure out how I could download such a large file @ 200-300MB/s -- until I found it had been served from cache and I eventually found the previous place I downloaded it to.

My main gripe is that this appears to be more about tracking 'traffic' and 'hits' than about security, which is actually *lowered* with more proxy-using sites being forced to decrypt HTTPS because of the large number of sites switching to HTTPS. Before -- HTTPS represented "sensitive" sites -- financial and maybe medical, but now, it represents "casual reading" of news and social sites. To continue caching and work-place monitoring of http usage, decoding https seems like its becoming an requirement. ;-(

Anyway, no preference, for me, which way this site goes given my proxy, but for those who don't have such -- probably no big deal on this site (given that's it's mostly text) anyway...

In reply to Re^3: SSL on PerlMonks by perl-diddler
in thread SSL on PerlMonks by sapadian

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    and all is quiet...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (4)
    As of 2018-07-20 07:20 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?
      It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?

      Results (426 votes). Check out past polls.