No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
In this particular case there's possibly a faster method though:
s/^(?!(?>.*?toto.*?foo))(.*?)foo/${1}bar/s; If toto or foo can be found in the near beginning, Abigail's pattern is a winner. This is, I guess, due to the overhead of the (?>) assertion. But the farther away toto or foo is the worse it gets for the step-by-step method (/(?:(?!foo).)*/), and the (?>) pattern gets faster. (This isn't just a theoretical win. Even though the overhead due to (?>), that pattern might very well win in a real-life situation.) But if I shall look at the big picture for a while though; in this case I find it hard to believe that any pattern can beat the plain and simple s/foo/bar/ unless /toto.*?foo/s; Even silly constructions like s/foo(?(?{index($`, 'toto') != -1})(?!))/bar/; is faster than the more generic solutions. Cheers, -Anomo In reply to Re: Re: Re: look-behind regex
by Anonymous Monk
|
|