![]() |
|
more useful options | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I found a solution that works, but to gain more understanding (and I'm stubborn that way) I want to know why my first solution does not work.
I'm parsing a file, looking for a single line to replace 2 characters. Line in question: My initial search/replace was this: This causes an error to be printed: A co-worker suggested a change, but didn't know why it might work: So I moved the leading and trailing underscore out of the parens and put them in the replace string. Here are some things I think I understand, but then again maybe not... 1. Backrefrences are 1-9, only a single digit. 2. Underscores are valid variable name components. So what changes between these two examples? If the first variable is being treated as $10_0, then why is the second not being treated as $1_0_0_? This solution also works: But it is probably slower than the other working solution. Thanks for the enlightenment! In reply to search, replace and backrefrences by Helter
|
|