![]() |
|
The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
By checking the value of waitpid for a possible -1 return, I never "think" I have kids left when I really don't. The -1 force-resets the hash. Good, I should check for the return value of wait as well. Thanks. Sorry if I am bothering you about this, but I am missing an information: why do you prefer waitpid to wait? Flexybility? Possibility to make waitpid a non-blocking call? What? Thanks in advance. --bronto The very nature of Perl to be like natural language--inconsistant and full of dwim and special cases--makes it impossible to know it all without simply memorizing the documentation (which is not complete or totally correct anyway). In reply to Don't wait: waitpid. Why?
by bronto
|
|