Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Your right Abigail. In the scheme of how future perl releases will behave, it is undefined. and is therefore unpredictable. I wasn't disagreeing with this. In terms of how any given installation of perl behaves now, then Deparse can illuminate the order in which things are evaluated. And if you inspect a few similar sets of Deparse outputs it becomes predictable how other similar expressions wil be evaluated for that given installation. This doesn't remove the risks associated with relying upon the current behaviour, and was not meant to encourage such reliance. Only to explain that behavour and show that it isn't random. Just unwritten and subject to change. Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller If I understand your problem, I can solve it! Of course, the same can be said for you. In reply to Re: Re: Auto-increment frenzy
by BrowserUk
|
|