Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Now good database design, has taught me that when one has a 1:N relationship, one should construct a new table to hold that relationship. I think you're over-normalizing here. This is a good idea for many-to-many relationships (there is no end to the half-baked ideas for doing that without a join table), but a join table on a one-to-many relationship is overkill. ---- : () { :|:& };: Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated In reply to Re: Class::DBI has_many
by hardburn
|
|