good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
In the case you describe, Borg::comment is overridden by Foo::comment, and, as a result of the architecture, is not directly callable using $obj->Borg::comment.
If it was intended by Foo's author that Borg::comment should be overridden, then no one should be writing code that uses Foo and also tries to by-pass Foo's version of the comment method. If the overriding was accidently, then either Foo's author can rename Foo::comment, or can provide a wrapper method so that the functionality of Borg::comment is made available under a different name. This is an interesting technical point, but I would imagine that a situation like this would rarely occur in practice. Nonetheless, I'll add information about this to the POD. Thanks. Update: Actually, this applies to more than just overridden methods. You can't use any fully-qualified method calls to inherited foreign classes. But then again, you shouldn't need to. Remember: There's always one more bug. In reply to Re^4: Inside-out objects inheriting from hash-based classes
by jdhedden
|
|