Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I could not agree with you more. The question as to
censor should of been intent, and not content. From my
understanding, the MPAA and the RIAA, in their respective
claims, are arguing content. However, since the node in
question wanted to know how it worked, not "cool, time to
rip DVD's...", censorship would be ill advised (unless under
legal threat -- to which vroom had said it would be taken
down).
As to clearly illegal items, such as warez (copying w/o licence aproval) -- items tested though the courts and found to be illegal -- a clear censoring would be in order. But then, we would of downvoted it by the hundreds, and the janitors would have to pry it out of the Node Reaper's hands. :D --
In reply to Re: Re: Node 541
by strredwolf
|
|