Just another Perl shrine | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I was surprised that this not only works, but also does not complain if strictures are added to the code. The code looks ingenious, but I wonder about two aspects: First, you are accessing a list one time as a hash via %NAME, and then the same list as an array, via @NAME. Is this considered accepted practice? Honestly, I hadn't expected it to work with lexically scoped variables, and I'm not sure whether this trick (if I can call it like this) will remain with later Perl versions. A more serious problem is the linewhere you rely on the fact that @keys gets its value first (from the grep) before it is used to form a slice for @new. I think this is undefined behaviour, isn't it?
-- Ronald Fischer <ynnor@mm.st> In reply to Re^2: grep for hash?
by rovf
|
|